WRE, through its work to write the Regional Plan and to plan for achieving the environmental destination ambitions, looks to secure a sustainable long-term supply of water for all sectors.
To achieve this ambition, the Regional Plan brings together several datasets to inform the future demand and supply of water. When analysing this information, to ensure a resilient and sustainable supply for water abstractors, users and the environment, a number of key questions are asked.
These questions might relate to the long-term sustainability of supply, the costs to implement new options, the impacts on abstractors from changes and more.
Through our Second Regional Plan, due to be published in 2029, we are keen to ensure that questions from all sectors and stakeholders are captured, expectations of us as a Regional Group are understood and that the Plan and surrounding work can aim to answer these questions.
Questions can be answered in a number of ways, from our water resource modelling, forecasting and optioneering work, to using different costs and impacts in our metrics.
Questions have already started to come forward through our stakeholder engagement and wider work – these have been captured below. We are keen to understand the questions that you would like to pose, which could be answered through our water resource planning.
We encourage questions that are both:
- Strategic, for example: Where is the water for new data centres going to come from? Or can the level of Cambridge growth be accommodated, whilst also restoring flows in the important chalk streams?
- Business or locally specific, for example: Is there an alternative to reducing abstractions licence volumes in my catchment, so that we can retain access to water when needed?
We will look to respond to the questions asked through the publication of our Regional Water Resources Plan. We may not be able to answer each question this planning round, but by gathering and collating your questions, it will give us direction and inform the questions that you would like asked of the Plan. Where we are not able to answer questions directly through the Plan or as a Regional Group, we can also signpost to those who can, expose the questions for wider sight in the context of regional water resources planning or collaborate with partner organisations to answer.
Please review the questions below and add your own through completing the form via the link at the bottom of this page.
We look forward to developing a collaborative Regional Plan that delivers a sustainable future supply of water across the region.
‘Big Questions’
The questions included below are examples of those that have been collated from stakeholder engagement activities and planning. The questions are not limited to those below and indeed, many of the questions sit in multiple sections.
Environmental destination
How are you measuring and displaying the significant impacts on abstractors and sectors from future abstraction licence reductions, e.g. the impact on food security from agriculture or community impacts from industry/amenity changes?
Can you test and share the impacts on abstractors and sectors from future abstraction licence reductions, e.g. the impact on food security from agriculture or community impacts from industry/amenity changes?
What would be the environmental implications for all abstraction reductions to happen concurrently (i.e. waiting for the slowest before all come into effect in a particular waterbody or catchment)?
How can stakeholders assess whether abstraction changes will impact flooding?
Questions to be asked specifically through environmental destination using the Environment Agency’s SACO (Sustainable Abstraction Calculator and Optimiser) tool include, but are not limited to:
- Adjusting Abstraction Sensitivity Bands (ASBs) based on local evidence
- Adjusting or relocating water recycling centre discharges
- Exclude specific sectors from abstraction reduction changes
- Changing abstraction timings or locations, for example moving abstractions downstream or moving abstractions from summer to winter
Adding additional abstraction protections, for example new surface water hands off flows. - Change targets for waterbodies based on improved evidence for RNAG (Reasons for not achieving good), for example where evidence shows flow has not been confirmed to be a certain issue
- Exclude abstraction licences from change, where the flow benefit ratio is low, except for areas with groundwater dependent terrestrial ecosystems
Will WRE consider wider economic implications of licence reductions, for example the effects on the rural economy? Should we make a case for public funding to support adaptation and resilience and to mitigate impact?
New water supply options
- How are you ensuring that available water is captured and used, e.g. high flow river water or pumped water from IDB areas?
- How will the proposed solutions (e.g. NbS) align with funding opportunities in order for land managers to deliver them – both private and public funding?
New water demand
- Have we got enough water for new data centres in the region?
- Should new data centres be located in a specific place in the region?
- Where does the water come from for the new housing developments being proposed?
- How do we factor in land use change? Sectors or industries, such as developers or agriculture have changing dynamics, even on a year-by-year basis. What year is used as the base year? How do you factor in local plans etc?
- How are future water needs balanced both between and within sectors for water demand? For example meeting the growth demands between both the livestock and horticulture industries?
- Regarding future growth scenarios, will the focus be just on the future use in local plans, such as supply for homes, data centres, industry, agriculture, or will you also consider development outside of the local plans (e.g. like the New Towns), the construction needs of these and the periods of time in which construction occurs? The wider infrastructure needs to support housing/growth and their additional demand would be useful to be considered in planning.
Reducing demand
- Shouldn’t we all just be using less water or incentivised to do so?
- What education programmes are in place for consumers and water users on water efficiency? Can these be increased?
- How far can we reduce water company leakage?
- Can all new building developments have grey water recycling built into them as standard?
- What portion of the projected deficit could be met regionally through demand management?
Environmental protection
- How is the water environment being protected and improved through regional water resource planning?
- To what extent has the degree of past environmental management already been done in a sustainable manner for the long term?
- Could nature based solutions (NbS) really improve rivers’ resilience to low flows and mean fewer cuts to abstractions?
Wider considerations
- How is water quality taken into account for water resource planning, eg. nitrates in rivers, salinity of the Fens or PFAS?
- Where is the funding going to come from for investment in new supply options for agriculture, industry and amenity sectors to ensure their resilience, e.g. storage reservoirs or rainwater harvesting?
- How can sustainable energy, for example micro hydro and floating solar, be incorporated to provide the energy needs of water management and treatment to deliver environmental destination and other outcomes?
Your questions are welcomed
Do you have a question that you would like adding to the list? We welcome all submissions by completing the short form available here:
‘Big questions’ for water resource planning – Fill in form
We will look to publish the responses to your ‘big questions’ as part of the publication of our Second Regional Water Resources Plan.